This is Stephen Blackmoore's second novel and it's unrelated to his  first, 
City of the Lost,
 at least in terms of  sequels or series.  There are a few tenuous 
connections--such as the  mysterious bar with multiple hard-to-find 
entrances, etc--but it's  really a stand-alone novel.  So if you've 
never read Stephen Blackmoore,  feel free to pick this one up and start 
here.
The basic premise is that Eric Carter is a necromancer, someone who  can
 see, talk to, and manipulate the dead.  It's a power he was born  with 
and after a sorcerer killed his parents, he fled Los Angeles and  used 
his powers to make a living . . . so to speak . . . abandoning his  
sister in the process.  Now, fifteen years later, he learns that someone
  has brutally murdered his sister, so he returns to L.A. to find her  
killer . . . and perhaps to take responsibility for the numerous  
mistakes he's made in his life, including running away in the first  
place.  But of course, he stumbles into something much larger than his  
sister's death, and he may just be forced to deal with the  
responsibility of his own powers in the process.
I thought this was a good book.  I'll repeat that I'm not a huge  fan of
 urban fantasy, so take that into account with this review.   Stephen 
Blackmoore does some really cool stuff in this book.  His idea  of what 
necromancy is, and the ways in which his character uses those  powers, 
has been taken to a whole new level here.  It's dark and gritty  and 
definitely not nice, which is the way necromancy should be.  But his  
main character--while rough and tough and deadly--also has a "good"  
side.  You can see his humanity and you can see his struggle dealing  
with his own power.  He's been traumatized and burned by his power  
often, but he's still fighting to remain "normal" in some sense.  So the
  world set-up and the characters in the book are great.
However, I thought the plotline wasn't as strong as it needed to  be.  
It didn't quite hang together as strongly as it could have and  there 
were a few "loose ends" that I didn't quite believe.  In essence,  Eric 
Carter came across as smarter than he behaved at certain points.  I  
thought some of the clues about what was really going on were rather  
obvious and Eric should have picked up on them much, much earlier.  If  
he had, it would have forced the plotline to become more complicated  
(unless the book was going to end rather abruptly and be a novella  
instead).  And that's what was missing.  The "complications" in the plot
  felt a little forced, brought on by the inability of the main 
character  to see what was happening, and this made the plot feel weak 
and loose  to me.  If more time had been spent on the plot, if it had 
been  developed more, the book would have been much, much stronger.  The
 world  and characters could certainly have supported it.
So, a good book, but not as strong as Stephen's first book.   Certainly 
entertaining, but I thought it could have supported a much  stronger, 
more complicated plot.
Joshua Palmatier/
Benjamin Tatewhen your husband cheats