SELECT * FROM uv_BookReviewRollup WHERE recordnum = 1765 Swords and Deviltry, by Fritz Leiber Book Review |

Swords and Deviltry, by Fritz Leiber cover image

Swords and Deviltry, by Fritz Leiber
Genre: Fantasy
Publisher: DH Press
Published: 1970
Review Posted: 4/8/2015
Reviewer Rating:
Reader Rating: 6 out of 10

Swords and Deviltry, by Fritz Leiber

Book Review by Joshua Palmatier

Have you read this book?

I'm probably going to get roasted by the SF&F community for this, but... After hearing about this series for ages, I finally decided to check it out as part of my "reading new authors" quest this year. This series has been around for a while (since the 60s and 70s) so it's a little retro and I tried to take that into account as I read it. That didn't seem to help too much.
The premise: This first book is really simply three stories woven together to produce a book. The Snow Women is the back story of Fafhrd, relating his early life and how and why he flees and ends up in Lankhmar. Similarly, The Unholy Grail is the back story of the Gray Mouser and how he ends up in Lankhmar. And finally, Ill Met in Lankhmar is the story of how the two meet and become the famed Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser.
The third story is where the heart of this book lies, and also where I assume Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser caught readers' imaginations and really took hold. It is where I finally became interested in the two characters and where the story drew me in, with the two heading off to figure out how to hurt the thieves' guild and get revenge. Of course, things don't work out as planned and what started off as a mostly drunken excursion to scout things out becomes something much more meaningful to both of them. This is the real story, and this one story is the main reason that I'll go on and read the next book in the series.
Unfortunately, the two back stories for Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser didn't really catch my interest or hold my attention as well, especially Fafhrd's story (which was the introduction story in this book). I kept reading mostly because of what I'd heard from others about this series and this pair. The Gray Mouser's back story was more interesting and better written. Maybe the reason the second and especially the third story caught my attention and held it better is because they were more of what I was expecting in terms of "sword and sorcery," which is what these stories really are.
As I said, I tried to give the style of the writing some leeway, since they were written before I was born and the style then was slightly different. For example, the omniscient POV was much more prevalent, so what we now call "head-hopping" was more common. Now, we try mostly for third-person limited POV and "head-hopping" is frowned on (although still done occasionally). I must admit the head-hopping threw me and it took me a while to get used to it. The language itself and the structures of the sentences were also slightly "off" from current fiction, and that took some getting used to.
But in the end, I really think that my issues were with the story, not the style. The first one just didn't catch me. The second piqued my interested more, but it was the third where I finally felt that I was "getting" what everyone was raving out. The third story drew me in and, again, is why I'll go ahead and continue with the second volume.
Joshua Palmatier/Benjamin Tate
Click here to buy Swords and Deviltry, by Fritz Leiber on Amazon

Swords and Deviltry, by Fritz Leiber on Amazon

Swords and Deviltry, by Fritz Leiber cover pic
Comment on Swords and Deviltry, by Fritz Leiber
Your Name:
Type (case sensitive) here:

Comments on Swords and Deviltry, by Fritz Leiber
Posted by Dave on 4/8/2015
Yes, Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser is often considered to be an integral part of the resurgence of sword and sorcery in the late 60s and early 70s on the heels of the Lancer/Ace republication of Howard's Conan stories starting in 1966. Same can be said of Moorcock's early Elric books (Stormbringer first saw print in 1965), also penned in the late 60s and early 70s.

I, too, have revisted these works from a 35+ years later perspective, and I, too, found them lacking as far as style and narrative energy (with Howard being the exception). What was so exciting and new and fresh and wild to a 13 year old sneaking a read behind his history book in class suffered from many of the issues you describe above.

But like the title of Thomas Wolfe's book says, You Can't Go Home Again.