SELECT * FROM uv_BookReviewRollup WHERE recordnum = 175 American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis Book Review | SFReader.com

American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis cover image

American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis
Genre: Horror
Publisher: Random House
Published: 1991
Review Posted: 7/20/2002
Reviewer Rating:
Reader Rating: 9 out of 10

American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis

Book Review by Paul Kane

Have you read this book?

Now that the movie version of American Psycho has at last arrived, with the video out to rent in Britain, it seems like as good a time as any to go back and re-examine the book that caused all the fuss in the first place near enough ten years ago. So, is the story dated, stranded back in the late 80s/early 90s groove, or will its message be just as pertinent another ten years down the line? Are the contents really as outrageous as everyone remembers, or have they paled beside the fictional and celluloid excesses of recent years? These and many more crucial issues will be addressed after this little recap.

Pat Bateman has it all. Money, brains, power, prestige. As a slick twenty-seven-year-old investment banker on Wall St, his days are spent clinching deals and dining out at only the most expensive restaurants, before heading off to the latest 'hot spot' night-clubs to get high on booze and drugs. Women are falling over themselves to get into bed with him, a consequence of his perfect model looks and his taut, bronzed body - honed in a $5,000 a year members only health club. And yet this still isn't enough for him...

Because Patrick Bateman is also a psychopath, a ruthless maniac with no remorse. He idolises the serial killers of the past (favourite: Ted Bundy), but actually outdoes them in every respect. He gratifies himself by torturing his victims, often videotaping the sessions to play back again later, and thinks nothing of attacking innocent vagrants on the street just for the sheer hell of it. But the best thing about it is he lives in a city, in a society, that doesn't seem to care what he does. In spite of the massive hints he drops - filling in crossword puzzles with the phrase 'meat and bone' over and over, wearing a costume at Halloween that says 'Mass Murderer' on the back, even going as far as to describe what he'd like to do to people right in front of their faces - the penny never drops. The police never catch him, although they do happen upon him accidentally at one point, and not one woman has reservations about going back with him to his luxury apartment, alone.

But Bateman's condition is getting worse. His need to kill growing stronger by the minute as the fine line he walks between fantasy and reality rapidly disintegrates (park benches appear to be chasing him and he sees breakfast cereals being interviewed on TV talk shows). Will he ever be able to satisfy his bloodlust, or will the pace he's set for himself burn this American Psycho out?

A novel plagued by controversy from the very start, after one publishing house abandoned the book on the eve it was due to go on sale, AP has both enhanced and tarnished the reputation of its author in equal measure. Ellis will forever be associated with this one misunderstood, pivotal piece, for better or for worse - although he claims he didn't write it for the reaction: rather he did it for personal reasons, the depression he was battling with during the late 80s giving the novel an all-too real sense of danger.

Yes, the much criticised scenes of death and violence are still shocking today - infinitely more distressing than anything in a King or Herbert book (I even found myself flinching at particular passages, and that doesn't happen very often nowadays). They have all the consistency of a road traffic accident and subsequently have the same effect on the bystander: you want to look away, but a certain morbid curiosity compels you to read on ('I finally use a Bic lighter and hold it up to both sockets, making sure they stay open with my fingers...until the eyeballs burst.'). And yes, women are treated abysmally, the sex scenes almost pornographic in nature, their bodies merely toys for Bateman to play with and discard afterwards - even his old sweetheart from college doesn't escape...But this is not done just for the sake of it, and anyone who thinks that is missing the point. By taking us to the edge, Ellis simultaneously emphasises the indifference of these characters and the culture that spawned them, yet at the same time ensures that the reader never falls into this particular trap.

Conversations revolve around clothes with designer labels and oblique business deals (especially the elusive 'Fisher Account'), around food and drink, around The Patty Winters Show and pop bands (there are three chapters devoted entirely to Genesis, Whitney Houston and Huey Lewis), around hair and make-up...Ellis exposes the superficiality of the 80s 'yuppie' brigade in a scathingly satirical way, the black comedy as funny as the slayings are graphic. In fact you can't help thinking that a lot of Bateman's victims actually deserve their fate, so caught up in their own little worlds that they fail to see the blindingly obvious until it pounces on them.

As the author comments in the book, there is no key to who Bateman is (he is timeless), but there is a warning about making life easy for him and his kind, about fostering their obsessions. So much more than just Wall Street meets Henry, and so far removed from Hitchcock's take as to be laughable (Bateman - Bates? - even criticises that movie for its lack of realistic gore), the book is a lesson to us all. This is Paul Kane, wearing a two-buttoned wool suit with pleated trousers by Luciano Soprani, a cotton shirt by Brooks Brothers and a silk tie by Armani. Ciao!
American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis on Amazon

American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis on Amazon

American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis cover pic
Comment on American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis
Your Name:
Comment:
Type (case sensitive) here:

Comments on American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis
Posted by Everett Logan on 6/24/2005
SPOLIER - DON'T READ UNLESS YOU'VE READ THE BOOK OR SEEN THE FILM

I’m amazed at how few people (both professional reviewers and amateurs alike) refuse to comment on the most important aspect of American Psycho (both the novel and the film). Of course, it gives away the ending, but the rest of their reviews (as is the case with Mr. Kane’s above) comment to a level that one could only appreciate or understand in retrospect anyway. The fact is that Bateman’s entire life as a serial killer is imagined. It was pure fantasy, or, perhaps more accurately, delusion. Bateman’s existence is so empty that he increasingly looks for meaning in the shallowest of pools around him – making the most monay, having the best body, best toned skin, best suit, best business card, getting into the best restaurants and clubs, picking up the most attractive women, etc. When each new level of achievement or conquest fails to satisfy, Bateman turns to fantasies of violence to make his life seem more real and full of meaning. As he loses himself more and more in his psychotic reveries, everything about his life seems to make less sense. Eventually, he can’t tell the difference between his real life and his fantasy life, as is the case with most people who are truly insane. Some people refuse to believe this twist in the ending and excuse it away by claiming that the fact that Bateman is never caught and that no one believes his confession just reinforces the shallowness, self-absorption, and lack of morality that they all have. To be frank, this is bollocks and wishful thinking on the part of people who, for whatever reason, want Bateman to be a killer instead of a deluded shell of vapidity searching for meaning in an insane way. The real ending makes him, and the entire story around him, much more interesting. Anyone can be a killer, after all. Killing people is not the hard part and doesn’t make as much of a statement. If Bateman is really a killer, it makes the story a macabre fairy tale just like any other slasher flick – the only difference is the setting. But, the fact that Bateman can carry on a seemingly ‘normal’ (by the standards of his peers, anyway) yuppy life while diving deeper and deeper into pure psychotic delusion is the whole point and is how the ‘social commentary’ that every reviewer mentions is delivered.
Posted by bluejack on 3/19/2003
A differing point of view: I don't think the book ages well, as a very large portion of the text relies on cultural references that are inextricably tied to the eighties. Secondly, I think the actual meat of the story (as it were) is rather trite -- the juxtaposition of materialism with spiritual void is neither original nor particularly thought provoking. The only things this book is noteworthy for, in my opinion, are the truly sick acts of torture that seem meant to titillate as much as to shock. And that is not something that, again in my opinion, a book *should* be noteworthy for. My experience of reading this book was simple: I felt manipulated by Ellis' style, but not at all enriched by any of his themes.
Posted by davefelts on 7/26/2002
well shoot, now I just HAVE to go read it.
Posted by sadbitch on 7/22/2002
Kane has nailed this gem of a book. Kudos to the reviewer,tho kane may be a bit harder core than i--the graphic scenes gave me nightmares for weeks and while i never doubted ellis' purity of purpose, i spent a good deal of time questioning my own blood lust for wanting to read it in the first place and then reading every single word no matter how much i flinched to turn away. an astonishingly chilling non-supernatural horror show, American Psycho is all the more moving because the central character is precisely non-supernatural, yet a terrifying blend of purely human and pure monster. AP is easily the best, most moving experience from any book i ever hated. well, not quite hated, but it is surely my absolute favorite book of those i didn't love. any study of evil this intense is as hard to love as it is easy to admire. ellis achieves absolute darkness, visible and dense, in patrick bateman and by focusing on rich kid stock broker bateman, he is able to comment on the cancer at the core of the american market and our entire mentality. it is a tricky mix: hilarious social satire and even occasional grand guinol slapstick puncuated by scenes of sadism and violence that steadily rise to, and go then FAR beyond, the worst things most of us have ever imagined. there are scenes in this book i am afriad to even recall. i call it a flawless master work, even though it gives me shivers to ever think of picking it up again.